Compare

Maple vs New Relic

New Relic charges per seat and per GB, and its core platform is closed source. Maple gives you the same full-stack observability with transparent usage-based pricing, no per-seat fees, and a open-source codebase under FSL-1.1 you can inspect, modify, and self-host.

Feature Maple New Relic
Pricing model
Usage-based, transparent
Per-seat + per-GB
Open source
FSL-1.1 → Apache 2.0
OpenTelemetry native
Distributed tracing
Log management
Metrics & dashboards
AI / MCP integration
Self-hosting available
No vendor lock-in
Proprietary agents, NRQL
Custom dashboards
Alerting
Why choose Maple

Key advantages over New Relic

No per-seat pricing

Add as many team members as you need. Maple charges based on data volume, not how many engineers need access to observability.

Open source

Every line of code is on GitHub. Audit the platform, contribute improvements, and never worry about what happens behind closed doors.

OpenTelemetry native

No proprietary agents required. Maple is built on OpenTelemetry standards, so your existing instrumentation works without modification.

AI & MCP integration

AI-powered diagnostics and MCP tool integration help you find root causes faster with automated analysis workflows.

Self-hosting option

Run Maple on your own infrastructure for full data sovereignty. Keep sensitive telemetry data within your network.

No vendor lock-in

Built entirely on open standards. Your instrumentation, your data formats, and your export pipelines remain portable.

오늘 첫 트레이스를 확인하세요.

SDK를 추가하고 OTLP를 Maple로 향하게 하면 트레이스가 도착합니다 — 대부분 5분 이내에 설정됩니다.

maple.dev — OpenTelemetry 위의 옵저버빌리티